You might enjoy this, and it might help with thinking about the questions you ask (especially since the last thing you say is false, lol):hokahey wrote:And this is what the argument eventually boils down to everytime I have this debate. Which disturbs me a little, because it's saying you're fine with an overreaching federal government functioning contrary to how they're supposed to because they're mandating things you agree with. What happens when they don't? They should not have that level of authority.mockbee wrote: I fear the dumb and am not all that keen on allowing ineptitude to rule in this country on any level when it comes to education and the environment. I realize people in smaller numbers can make better decisions sometimes, but when it comes to those two issues, the rallying cries I hear from those smaller groups are terrifying.
Perhaps, but what happens when these options are governed by the largest possible beaurocracy as opposed to many smaller bodies? Are they still more efficient? Look at welfare. Is welfare best governed at the federal level or the local level? Who will better be able to have a read on the needs of each participant? Which level will best understand how to govern the program based on unique local conditions? The answer is obvious.Adurentibus Spina wrote:You undermine efficiency and effectiveness of some kinds of public services if you allow private options, or don't make it single-payer. This is most pronounced in insurance and education.
Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
I will never have the chance to watch that. Just being honest. If you care to summarize that'd be great.Adurentibus Spina wrote:You might enjoy this, and it might help with thinking about the questions you ask (especially since the last thing you say is false, lol):hokahey wrote:And this is what the argument eventually boils down to everytime I have this debate. Which disturbs me a little, because it's saying you're fine with an overreaching federal government functioning contrary to how they're supposed to because they're mandating things you agree with. What happens when they don't? They should not have that level of authority.mockbee wrote: I fear the dumb and am not all that keen on allowing ineptitude to rule in this country on any level when it comes to education and the environment. I realize people in smaller numbers can make better decisions sometimes, but when it comes to those two issues, the rallying cries I hear from those smaller groups are terrifying.
Perhaps, but what happens when these options are governed by the largest possible beaurocracy as opposed to many smaller bodies? Are they still more efficient? Look at welfare. Is welfare best governed at the federal level or the local level? Who will better be able to have a read on the needs of each participant? Which level will best understand how to govern the program based on unique local conditions? The answer is obvious.Adurentibus Spina wrote:You undermine efficiency and effectiveness of some kinds of public services if you allow private options, or don't make it single-payer. This is most pronounced in insurance and education.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
He talks about a lot of stuff... don't think I can offer a summary... it would be pages long. I think he's very fair to what happens to be true about economic conservatism, but he's pretty convincing with respect to "properly structured market conditions" (which is taken right out of Adam Smith, etc, anyway).
He also knocks down the notion of the government as a consumer, and thus of taxation as "bad". The first 10 minutes even, would be good to check out if you can... no worries though... I forget that other people aren't constantly stuck in front of a computer except at work where they can't really watch videos.
Maybe others will watch it and get something from it.
He also knocks down the notion of the government as a consumer, and thus of taxation as "bad". The first 10 minutes even, would be good to check out if you can... no worries though... I forget that other people aren't constantly stuck in front of a computer except at work where they can't really watch videos.
Maybe others will watch it and get something from it.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Interesting. Maybe I can watch it on my phone on a break or something. I rarely ever turn on my home PC.Adurentibus Spina wrote:He talks about a lot of stuff... don't think I can offer a summary... it would be pages long. I think he's very fair to what happens to be true about economic conservatism, but he's pretty convincing with respect to "properly structured market conditions" (which is taken right out of Adam Smith, etc, anyway).
He also knocks down the notion of the government as a consumer, and thus of taxation as "bad". The first 10 minutes even, would be good to check out if you can... no worries though... I forget that other people aren't constantly stuck in front of a computer except at work where they can't really watch videos.
Maybe others will watch it and get something from it.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
I've just found another INFOGRAPHIC type thing, and it would be interesting to compare the two:
http://www.good.is/post/how-many-minimu ... cent-life/
( http://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/oo ... -Map_0.pdf )
It looks sort of like the South just reports being very religious, regardless of cost of living, but elsewhere, cost of living seems inversely correlated to religiosity.
http://www.good.is/post/how-many-minimu ... cent-life/
( http://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/oo ... -Map_0.pdf )
It looks sort of like the South just reports being very religious, regardless of cost of living, but elsewhere, cost of living seems inversely correlated to religiosity.
- farrellgirl99
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:20 pm
- Location: Queens
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Holy shit, NY. I'd need to work 136 hours a week at my jobAdurentibus Spina wrote:I've just found another INFOGRAPHIC type thing, and it would be interesting to compare the two:
http://www.good.is/post/how-many-minimu ... cent-life/
( http://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/oo ... -Map_0.pdf )
It looks sort of like the South just reports being very religious, regardless of cost of living, but elsewhere, cost of living seems inversely correlated to religiosity.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
I'm sure Stalin did what he did in the name of atheism.
You have to understand that atheism is not a religion. They don't work the same.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Stalin thought he was a God. Read his letters he wrote to his mom.
You have to understand, Hoka, that the epithet 'atheist' was historically a synonym for 'immoral', because morality was tied to piety (i.e., false piety, or the appearance of religiosity). This is just a fact. It's why Spinoza denied being an atheist, and why his critics often said things like: It's such a shame that such a nice person could be an atheist.
The philosophy was called an 'abomination' and worse, not because of the content, but because they thought it entailed moral nihilism.
This belief about atheism persists... the connection between a lack of faith in a higher power and amoralism or evil... it's just false, man.
As Stephen Weinberg once put it: good people do good things, and bad people do bad things, but for good people to do bad things, that takes religion.
You have to understand, Hoka, that the epithet 'atheist' was historically a synonym for 'immoral', because morality was tied to piety (i.e., false piety, or the appearance of religiosity). This is just a fact. It's why Spinoza denied being an atheist, and why his critics often said things like: It's such a shame that such a nice person could be an atheist.
The philosophy was called an 'abomination' and worse, not because of the content, but because they thought it entailed moral nihilism.
This belief about atheism persists... the connection between a lack of faith in a higher power and amoralism or evil... it's just false, man.
As Stephen Weinberg once put it: good people do good things, and bad people do bad things, but for good people to do bad things, that takes religion.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
I liked that. Gonna use it ASAP.Adurentibus Spina wrote: As Stephen Weinberg once put it: good people do good things, and bad people do bad things, but for good people to do bad things, that takes religion.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
I spelled his name wrong. But I really enjoyed these broadcasts years ago, and especially Weinberg's part: (Arthur Miller's is really great too)Larry B. wrote:I liked that. Gonna use it ASAP.Adurentibus Spina wrote: As Stephen Weinberg once put it: good people do good things, and bad people do bad things, but for good people to do bad things, that takes religion.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
For a country that seems to be so religious,I find it odd that Good Friday isn't a statutory holiday in the US.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Yeah really. Without the resurrection, Christianity is just a bunch of hippie crap.Artemis wrote:For a country that seems to be so religious,I find it odd that Good Friday isn't a statutory holiday in the US.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
I didn't know Steven. I love Steven. I feel identified with Steven. All those sighs while describing why he doesn't like religion, while still looking calm and somewhat unnerved... I can see myself right there.Adurentibus Spina wrote:I spelled his name wrong. But I really enjoyed these broadcasts years ago, and especially Weinberg's part: (Arthur Miller's is really great too)Larry B. wrote:I liked that. Gonna use it ASAP.Adurentibus Spina wrote: As Stephen Weinberg once put it: good people do good things, and bad people do bad things, but for good people to do bad things, that takes religion.
Thanks
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Cool, Larry. Weinberg won the Nobel Prize years ago. Dude's really smart. At one point he talks about the hope physicists have that there might be a better alternative to the Copenhagen interpretation of QM that I think is really interesting.
The other parts of "The Atheism Tapes" are worth watching too.
The other parts of "The Atheism Tapes" are worth watching too.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Adurentibus Spina wrote:Yeah really. Without the resurrection, Christianity is just a bunch of hippie crap.Artemis wrote:For a country that seems to be so religious,I find it odd that Good Friday isn't a statutory holiday in the US.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Adurentibus Spina wrote:Cool, Larry. Weinberg won the Nobel Prize years ago. Dude's really smart. At one point he talks about the hope physicists have that there might be a better alternative to the Copenhagen interpretation of QM that I think is really interesting.
The other parts of "The Atheism Tapes" are worth watching too.
I found all parts in Demonoid. This should be a very good self-help exercise. Thanks again.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
But then I have to take a personal day if I wish to partake in Yom Kippur which is a high holy day.Artemis wrote:For a country that seems to be so religious,I find it odd that Good Friday isn't a statutory holiday in the US.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Personally I don't even think Christmas should be a Federal Holiday. You want to celebrate?? Take a personal day like I have to on Yom Kippur.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
i had good friday off. they call it "spring holiday".Romeo wrote:But then I have to take a personal day if I wish to partake in Yom Kippur which is a high holy day.Artemis wrote:For a country that seems to be so religious,I find it odd that Good Friday isn't a statutory holiday in the US.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Personally I don't even think Christmas should be a Federal Holiday. You want to celebrate?? Take a personal day like I have to on Yom Kippur.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
That's what I'd be all for. Give workers 7 extra personal days for their religious festivities or whatever they want. In Chile, Good Friday and Good Saturday are official holidays; however, I took Friday just like any other day.Romeo wrote:But then I have to take a personal day if I wish to partake in Yom Kippur which is a high holy day.Artemis wrote:For a country that seems to be so religious,I find it odd that Good Friday isn't a statutory holiday in the US.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Personally I don't even think Christmas should be a Federal Holiday. You want to celebrate?? Take a personal day like I have to on Yom Kippur.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Get the fuck away from my pagan traditions. Most everybody gets a whole buncha time off, and they like it. You can't organize school some other way. You can't make up for the deficits of workers at certain places in other ways. This shit works and we don't need to fuck it up. We don't need to further splinter the country out of some misguided political correctness. People need a fucking break in the winter, that's why various cultures all over the world have variations on the solstice deal. That's why we call it winter break. You know how fucking quiet it gets on Christmas Saturnalia night? It's beautiful. When I was a kid I wanted to go skiing and shit with my little Jewish friends - you don't need to have everybody going off at different times. Besides, it saves on electricity and heat and janitorial staff in public schools and a lot of other places. As a non-religious person, I've gotta say, gtfo with that bullshit.Romeo wrote:But then I have to take a personal day if I wish to partake in Yom Kippur which is a high holy day.Artemis wrote:For a country that seems to be so religious,I find it odd that Good Friday isn't a statutory holiday in the US.
Easter is the holiest of the Christian holidays.
Personally I don't even think Christmas should be a Federal Holiday. You want to celebrate?? Take a personal day like I have to on Yom Kippur.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Just saw episodes 1 and 2. Some very good stuff. I loved the unicorn comparison.Larry B. wrote:Adurentibus Spina wrote:Cool, Larry. Weinberg won the Nobel Prize years ago. Dude's really smart. At one point he talks about the hope physicists have that there might be a better alternative to the Copenhagen interpretation of QM that I think is really interesting.
The other parts of "The Atheism Tapes" are worth watching too.
I found all parts in Demonoid. This should be a very good self-help exercise. Thanks again.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Was that Colin McGinn? I could probably meet him, if I wanted to... I think he's wrong about a lot of stuff.Larry B. wrote:Just saw episodes 1 and 2. Some very good stuff. I loved the unicorn comparison.Larry B. wrote:Adurentibus Spina wrote:Cool, Larry. Weinberg won the Nobel Prize years ago. Dude's really smart. At one point he talks about the hope physicists have that there might be a better alternative to the Copenhagen interpretation of QM that I think is really interesting.
The other parts of "The Atheism Tapes" are worth watching too.
I found all parts in Demonoid. This should be a very good self-help exercise. Thanks again.
Re: Gallup Poll: U.S. States by Religiosity
Yes, Colin McGinn. What I didn't like about him was that he seemed to be one of those people who come across as smart only because he knows what a lot of people said about something. To me, that's almost worthless in a philosopher. In a philosophy teacher, it's awesome! But in a philosopher it's just 33% of the job. You gotta put some new stuff, new insights, new perspectives. In my opinion, anyway.Adurentibus Spina wrote:Was that Colin McGinn? I could probably meet him, if I wanted to... I think he's wrong about a lot of stuff.Larry B. wrote:Just saw episodes 1 and 2. Some very good stuff. I loved the unicorn comparison.Larry B. wrote:Adurentibus Spina wrote:Cool, Larry. Weinberg won the Nobel Prize years ago. Dude's really smart. At one point he talks about the hope physicists have that there might be a better alternative to the Copenhagen interpretation of QM that I think is really interesting.
The other parts of "The Atheism Tapes" are worth watching too.
I found all parts in Demonoid. This should be a very good self-help exercise. Thanks again.