So unless a central government is responsible for maintaining the parks of a country it's not a country?Adurentibus Spina wrote:Yes there is. That's what states are... that's what a national identity is...hokahey wrote:I'm not arguing that at all. I'm saying they should be sold to private interests.Adurentibus Spina wrote: It's idiotic to think that that's something that should be left to a state-by-state basis...
Well, they are ...states. But no, not private counrtries. And just because there's no collective heritage being preserved at a federal level doesn't mean we should be seperate countries. There's really no substance to that point.You either have a collective heritage that it's in everyone's interest to preserve, or you should just be separate countries.
Billionaire funding artificial libertarian islands
Re: Billionaire funding artificial libertarian islands
Re: Billionaire funding artificial libertarian islands
That's not the most significant part of what that act did or does.