Porno?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:19 pm
Re: Porno?
whats up with the new music?
Re: Porno?
and marytn talks some shit. it's weird that he played with perry in vegas a few years ago but now seems like he would never again.
and.....it's goneMartyn LeNoble @martynlenoble 7m
.“@perryfarrell: Such enthusiasm for PFP. Such that I'm considering going out live.Yes?" 2 replies...no need to say more.
My beautiful wife told me to delete my last tweet. She's probably right. (She often is) Goodnight!
Re: Porno?
LOL
Isn't Flea pissed at him too, for some reason?
What's with bass players hating Perry? is it because he tries to hum bass ideas to them constantly?
Isn't Flea pissed at him too, for some reason?
What's with bass players hating Perry? is it because he tries to hum bass ideas to them constantly?
Re: Porno?
Not sure that I follow. Is it that Martyn made fun of the fact that only two people replied to Perry's post about going out live?creep wrote: and marytn talks some shit. it's weird that he played with perry in vegas a few years ago but now seems like he would never again.
and.....it's goneMartyn LeNoble @martynlenoble 7m
.“@perryfarrell: Such enthusiasm for PFP. Such that I'm considering going out live.Yes?" 2 replies...no need to say more.
My beautiful wife told me to delete my last tweet. She's probably right. (She often is) Goodnight!
Re: Porno?
Precisely.hokahey wrote:Not sure that I follow. Is it that Martyn made fun of the fact that only two people replied to Perry's post about going out live?creep wrote: and marytn talks some shit. it's weird that he played with perry in vegas a few years ago but now seems like he would never again.
and.....it's goneMartyn LeNoble @martynlenoble 7m
.“@perryfarrell: Such enthusiasm for PFP. Such that I'm considering going out live.Yes?" 2 replies...no need to say more.
My beautiful wife told me to delete my last tweet. She's probably right. (She often is) Goodnight!
Re: Porno?
Yeah, he seams to be mocking that only 2 people responded.
I don't know how I feel about P4P playing live. I'd obviously go if they played in NY. Perry's voice is more suited for this at his age, but aesthetically I don't want to see Hollywood Perry performing these songs with his wife on stage. At least she was a relapse dancer and had a slight connection as a performer with them when they reconvened from 2001 and on. She has no affiliation with P4P. I saw them about 8 or 9 times and every show was magic to me. The vibe around them was out of control. After watching Jane's become old and cheesy, I'd like to hold on to my roseland, Irving plaza, and enit memories.
I don't know how I feel about P4P playing live. I'd obviously go if they played in NY. Perry's voice is more suited for this at his age, but aesthetically I don't want to see Hollywood Perry performing these songs with his wife on stage. At least she was a relapse dancer and had a slight connection as a performer with them when they reconvened from 2001 and on. She has no affiliation with P4P. I saw them about 8 or 9 times and every show was magic to me. The vibe around them was out of control. After watching Jane's become old and cheesy, I'd like to hold on to my roseland, Irving plaza, and enit memories.
Re: Porno?
Having said all that, I'd still be one of the first on line for tickets, lol
Re: Porno?
Enit in NJ was the best P4P show I saw. I'd still rather see Janes but an acoustic Porno set would always be welcomed.
Re: Porno?
blackula wrote:
but aesthetically I don't want to see Hollywood Perry performing these songs with his wife on stage.
He'd probably not be allowed to perform anything related to Eric or another woman, thus allowing him to play Pets 11 times with Pets as an encore.
Re: Porno?
You'd take seeing Janes for the hundreth time in the last 15 years over a P4P show?bman wrote:I'd still rather see Janes.
Re: Porno?
if it does happen, you should hold on to those memories and skip it.blackula wrote:Yeah, he seams to be mocking that only 2 people responded.
I don't know how I feel about P4P playing live. I'd obviously go if they played in NY. Perry's voice is more suited for this at his age, but aesthetically I don't want to see Hollywood Perry performing these songs with his wife on stage. At least she was a relapse dancer and had a slight connection as a performer with them when they reconvened from 2001 and on. She has no affiliation with P4P. I saw them about 8 or 9 times and every show was magic to me. The vibe around them was out of control. After watching Jane's become old and cheesy, I'd like to hold on to my roseland, Irving plaza, and enit memories.
Re: Porno?
generally i can't stand it when forum posts generalize with comments like 'anyone who would [so and so] is an idiot'. because taste is taste. but i'll break my own rule here. personally, as i've said before, i think that on the tgea tour, the vibe that perry was putting out with his performance and the staging was well suited for a p4p reunion. but taste is taste and of the 30 or so people who still give a fuck about jane's, some obviously are completely over perry farrell, for reasons they've articulated here.
having said that, anyone who would miss a p4p club show [a short set on lolla or a money grub opening slot on some other band's big stage tour in empty venues does not apply], thus missing the opportunity to see pete, perk and watt play those incredible songs for the first time in 16 years, is a fucking moron and needs to retire from this forum and find something to comment on that they don't hate. it just ain't healthy. i'm not saying that one has to love it or look forward to it as though it was 1989 ja coming to play a private show in your backyard, but fuck, man, if you're here and don't want to see that, what the fuck??? really. what the fuck????
having said that, anyone who would miss a p4p club show [a short set on lolla or a money grub opening slot on some other band's big stage tour in empty venues does not apply], thus missing the opportunity to see pete, perk and watt play those incredible songs for the first time in 16 years, is a fucking moron and needs to retire from this forum and find something to comment on that they don't hate. it just ain't healthy. i'm not saying that one has to love it or look forward to it as though it was 1989 ja coming to play a private show in your backyard, but fuck, man, if you're here and don't want to see that, what the fuck??? really. what the fuck????
Re: Porno?
tubro wrote: thus missing the opportunity to see pete, perk and watt play those incredible songs for the first time in 16 years
This conveniently leaves out the reason most people would avoid the show, which is Perry. He's the wildcard, and more often than not these days he tends to disappoint. I think more people would be inclined to see P4P play instrumentally without Perry than with.
Re: Porno?
no wayhokahey wrote: I think more people would be inclined to see P4P play instrumentally without Perry than with.
my main complaint with jane's is they play the same songs over and over. if jane's constantly changed up their setlist i could overlook perry's voice.
i would jump at the chance to see perry sing some p4p.
- Pandemonium
- Posts: 5724
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: Porno?
I'm ambivalent about a P4P reunion. Personally, I never had anywhere near the same level of interest I (used to have) with Janes and while yeah, hearing some of the old stuff once again after nearly 2 decades would be cool, it's still likely gonna be bleeding another corpse dry. On one hand, I'd be more interested in seeing them live if there's a healthy dose of new material just for the surprise factor but on the other hand, we're talking 21st Century Perry quality here so maybe lounge singer Perry crooning the old mellow stoner tunes from the same setlist every show is the better option.
Re: Porno?
i don't want to see perry fuck up porno too...i wouldn't walk down the block to see perry do anything anymore. most people are long since over being around these forums for jane's et al. and are here for the people who post....like said i would prob go if it was everyone but perry ...i would much rather see hellride doing stooges covers then porno in 2013 with perry fucking it up along with his cunt wife on the stagetubro wrote:anyone who would miss a p4p club show [a short set on lolla or a money grub opening slot on some other band's big stage tour in empty venues does not apply], thus missing the opportunity to see pete, perk and watt play those incredible songs for the first time in 16 years, is a fucking moron and needs to retire from this forum and find something to comment on that they don't hate. it just ain't healthy. i'm not saying that one has to love it or look forward to it as though it was 1989 ja coming to play a private show in your backyard, but fuck, man, if you're here and don't want to see that, what the fuck??? really. what the fuck????
Re: Porno?
I remember someone saying that way back. Which is why i posed it as a question, to see if anyone confirmed.someguy wrote:Why is flea mad at perry?
Re: Porno?
Please someone take note that it was not me who called E a Ckv wrote:.i would much rather see hellride doing stooges covers then porno in 2013 with perry fucking it up along with his cunt wife on the stage
Re: Porno?
I hear ya, but I'd guess a poll would prove my point. If only I cared enough to make one.creep wrote:no wayhokahey wrote: I think more people would be inclined to see P4P play instrumentally without Perry than with.
my main complaint with jane's is they play the same songs over and over. if jane's constantly changed up their setlist i could overlook perry's voice.
i would jump at the chance to see perry sing some p4p.
Re: Porno?
I'd like to see one P4P show, just out of curiosity. At least for that one show it wouldn't be the same few songs that have been played 10,000 times over the last decade.
Re: Porno?
Yeah thats what we want to hear, we want that aggresive urgent sound you brought on the first cd.pete wrote:I have read every single post in this thread. I love Etty and I think she is gangster. Perry sounds great in these new songs. The mojo is a gift. I will do my best to keep it real. Love & Respect...Pete
Re: Porno?
hokahey wrote:I hear ya, but I'd guess a poll would prove my point. If only I cared enough to make one.creep wrote:no wayhokahey wrote: I think more people would be inclined to see P4P play instrumentally without Perry than with.
my main complaint with jane's is they play the same songs over and over. if jane's constantly changed up their setlist i could overlook perry's voice.
i would jump at the chance to see perry sing some p4p.
I guarantee a poll would prove you wrong. I f you werent so lazy.
Re: Porno?
clickie wrote:Yeah thats what we want to hear, we want that aggresive urgent sound you brought on the first cd.pete wrote:I have read every single post in this thread. I love Etty and I think she is gangster. Perry sounds great in these new songs. The mojo is a gift. I will do my best to keep it real. Love & Respect...Pete
That's what he said?