JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

Discussion regarding Jane's Addiction news and associated projects
Message
Author
Hokahey
Site Admin
Posts: 5416
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#26 Post by Hokahey » Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:49 am

Tyler Durden wrote: Now the band seems to back to where they were in '03.
I don't entirely agree. I like what they're doing now more so than compared to 2003. The stage shows have gotten better presentation wise. Remember the shiny metallic platforms from Lolla 2003? Dave's glitter pants?

I like the IF and ETTL videos better than the Strays videos.

I think the new music is less embarassing.

I'm not trying to convince anyone these guys are back to their glory days, but if OG Jane's was a 10, Strays was a 4 and this is a 4.2 :lol:

Tyler Durden

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#27 Post by Tyler Durden » Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:52 am

hokahey wrote:
Tyler Durden wrote: Now the band seems to back to where they were in '03.
I don't entirely agree. I like what they're doing now more so than compared to 2003. The stage shows have gotten better presentation wise. Remember the shiny metallic platforms from Lolla 2003? Dave's glitter pants?

I like the IF and ETTL videos better than the Strays videos.

I think the new music is less embarassing.

I'm not trying to convince anyone these guys are back to their glory days, but if OG Jane's was a 10, Strays was a 4 and this is a 4.2 :lol:
As I was reading this, I was thinking "Hoka is splitting hairs". Nice ending. :lol:

User avatar
Jasper
Posts: 2322
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:28 pm

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#28 Post by Jasper » Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:59 am

hokahey wrote:
Jasper wrote:
hokahey wrote:Where a business stops meeting the demands of it's consumers...
You must mean when the consumers suddenly discovered a way to steal as much of the business's product as they want.

The record industry wasn't diminished because people didn't want their product, or because people became able to self-release albums. Self-released albums aren't making much money in the grand scheme of things - mostly they're acting as advertisements for live performances. The industry was diminished because people elected to steal rather than go the route of being consumers, in the capitalist sense of the word.

Hooray for anti-capitalist crime! :banana:

1. I'd argue that file sharing would have never caught on as much as it did had compact discs not been grossly overpriced to begin with.

2. Most artists couldn't care less that the RIAA is dying.

No one is stepping in to help because as a producer no one cares about their distribution methods exactly because their model and delivery of product was flawed and unsustainable.

That's what happens, or should unless the government steps in to bail them out, when you have an entity that has become antiquated due to it's own poor business paractices. No one's rallying around to save them.
Image

A lot of things are over-priced. Hell, most things, I'd say. Should I steal those things, too? If CDs had been five dollars when napster came around, I'm pretty sure people would have pirated them anyways, eventually. I know I would have. Maybe it wouldn't have happened as fast, but my preferred price is zero on all goods, and that seems to hold true for most people.

That most artists don't care that the RIAA is hurting doesn't matter; most artists could never get a record deal in the first place. :noclue:

So, I agree with you. Fuck capitalist fat cats. Let's steal. Everything. Then, when they're all bled dry, we can actually live in a sustainable world.

Tyler Durden

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#29 Post by Tyler Durden » Wed Aug 31, 2011 9:15 am

Jasper wrote:
hokahey wrote:
Jasper wrote:
hokahey wrote:Where a business stops meeting the demands of it's consumers...
You must mean when the consumers suddenly discovered a way to steal as much of the business's product as they want.

The record industry wasn't diminished because people didn't want their product, or because people became able to self-release albums. Self-released albums aren't making much money in the grand scheme of things - mostly they're acting as advertisements for live performances. The industry was diminished because people elected to steal rather than go the route of being consumers, in the capitalist sense of the word.

Hooray for anti-capitalist crime! :banana:

1. I'd argue that file sharing would have never caught on as much as it did had compact discs not been grossly overpriced to begin with.

2. Most artists couldn't care less that the RIAA is dying.

No one is stepping in to help because as a producer no one cares about their distribution methods exactly because their model and delivery of product was flawed and unsustainable.

That's what happens, or should unless the government steps in to bail them out, when you have an entity that has become antiquated due to it's own poor business paractices. No one's rallying around to save them.
Image

A lot of things are over-priced. Hell, most things, I'd say. Should I steal those things, too? If CDs had been five dollars when napster came around, I'm pretty sure people would have pirated them anyways, eventually. I know I would have. Maybe it wouldn't have happened as fast, but my preferred price is zero on all goods, and that seems to hold true for most people.

That most artists don't care that the RIAA is hurting doesn't matter; most artists could never get a record deal in the first place. :noclue:

So, I agree with you. Fuck capitalist fat cats. Let's steal. Everything. Then, when they're all bled dry, we can actually live in a sustainable world.
Ironic that you're not allowed to hot link to a jpeg that endorses grand theft auto. :lol:

User avatar
Pandemonium
Posts: 5720
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#30 Post by Pandemonium » Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:10 am

Jasper wrote: A lot of things are over-priced. Hell, most things, I'd say. Should I steal those things, too? If CDs had been five dollars when napster came around, I'm pretty sure people would have pirated them anyways, eventually. I know I would have. Maybe it wouldn't have happened as fast, but my preferred price is zero on all goods, and that seems to hold true for most people.

That most artists don't care that the RIAA is hurting doesn't matter; most artists could never get a record deal in the first place. :noclue:

So, I agree with you. Fuck capitalist fat cats. Let's steal. Everything. Then, when they're all bled dry, we can actually live in a sustainable world.
I pretty much agree with what you're saying. Technology and a sense of entitlement on the consumer end sped the demise of the traditional way artists profited from (and where profited from) their work.

But I also agree that the standard record company business model has always been designed to rape the artist, most of whom have zero business sense and relied on lawyers, managers, etc who also happily fucked them over. There's so many bands who've lost their publishing rights to their own music to satisfy a label's contract because they were fronted/billed so much money for everything from producing albums and touring to stupid shit like parties, drugs and personal purchases like cars and homes. Think about it - most artists are barely out of High School and playing music and chasing pussy is about the extent of their skill set and they land a complicated record deal with a couple million dollar advance and who-knows-what interest..... yeah that's a recipe to future financial disaster.

What's really sad is the current climate for older, established artists is simply tour, tour, tour and flog their decade's old hits to an aging (and dwindling) audience of their peers. There's really no incentive to make new music (outside the artistic desire to create new music) unless you want to sell it to big businesses basically as backing music for a movie or commercial so it'll get heard. Record companies have fallen to simply using TV shows like American Idol to quickly sign, sell and throw away disposable cookie cutter pop singers. More than ever, "talent" is a commodity and the standards are in the gutter these days. There's little financial or artistic incentive for kids to go out there and start a new band now - you have to not only be a musician, but you need to have a strong sense of modern self promotion and business sense. You'll do better going through law school or getting into politics if you're that savy.

The odds of younger, newer artists making any headway is akin to winning the lottery now. Most that have achieved some level of success are doing it the old fashioned way through the few big record companies left that still have some money to spend signing a new act they feel they can exploit. For every Arcade Fire or Muse that have "made it" the past 10 years there's thousands of bands that are playing bars on weekends and posting their music for free on webpages that will never get beyond a few hundred dedicated listeners. The current climate in rock music is that bleak.

Hokahey
Site Admin
Posts: 5416
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#31 Post by Hokahey » Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:09 am

Jasper wrote:
hokahey wrote:
Jasper wrote:
hokahey wrote:Where a business stops meeting the demands of it's consumers...
You must mean when the consumers suddenly discovered a way to steal as much of the business's product as they want.

The record industry wasn't diminished because people didn't want their product, or because people became able to self-release albums. Self-released albums aren't making much money in the grand scheme of things - mostly they're acting as advertisements for live performances. The industry was diminished because people elected to steal rather than go the route of being consumers, in the capitalist sense of the word.

Hooray for anti-capitalist crime! :banana:

1. I'd argue that file sharing would have never caught on as much as it did had compact discs not been grossly overpriced to begin with.

2. Most artists couldn't care less that the RIAA is dying.

No one is stepping in to help because as a producer no one cares about their distribution methods exactly because their model and delivery of product was flawed and unsustainable.

That's what happens, or should unless the government steps in to bail them out, when you have an entity that has become antiquated due to it's own poor business paractices. No one's rallying around to save them.
Image

A lot of things are over-priced. Hell, most things, I'd say. Should I steal those things, too? If CDs had been five dollars when napster came around, I'm pretty sure people would have pirated them anyways, eventually. I know I would have. Maybe it wouldn't have happened as fast, but my preferred price is zero on all goods, and that seems to hold true for most people.

That most artists don't care that the RIAA is hurting doesn't matter; most artists could never get a record deal in the first place. :noclue:

Fact is, the internet allowed artists to distribute their own work, which they are. Major artists that could be making a label money.
So, I agree with you. Fuck capitalist fat cats. Let's steal. Everything. Then, when they're all bled dry, we can actually live in a sustainable world.
:crazy:

User avatar
Jasper
Posts: 2322
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:28 pm

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#32 Post by Jasper » Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:29 am

hokahey wrote:
Jasper wrote:
hokahey wrote:
Jasper wrote:
hokahey wrote:Where a business stops meeting the demands of it's consumers...
You must mean when the consumers suddenly discovered a way to steal as much of the business's product as they want.

The record industry wasn't diminished because people didn't want their product, or because people became able to self-release albums. Self-released albums aren't making much money in the grand scheme of things - mostly they're acting as advertisements for live performances. The industry was diminished because people elected to steal rather than go the route of being consumers, in the capitalist sense of the word.

Hooray for anti-capitalist crime! :banana:

1. I'd argue that file sharing would have never caught on as much as it did had compact discs not been grossly overpriced to begin with.

2. Most artists couldn't care less that the RIAA is dying.

No one is stepping in to help because as a producer no one cares about their distribution methods exactly because their model and delivery of product was flawed and unsustainable.

That's what happens, or should unless the government steps in to bail them out, when you have an entity that has become antiquated due to it's own poor business paractices. No one's rallying around to save them.
Image

A lot of things are over-priced. Hell, most things, I'd say. Should I steal those things, too? If CDs had been five dollars when napster came around, I'm pretty sure people would have pirated them anyways, eventually. I know I would have. Maybe it wouldn't have happened as fast, but my preferred price is zero on all goods, and that seems to hold true for most people.

That most artists don't care that the RIAA is hurting doesn't matter; most artists could never get a record deal in the first place. :noclue:
Very few major artists release their music independently, a drop in the ocean, and even less do it solely through the internet. It's not like everyone's not stealing self-released stuff and things from indie labels anyway. I think indie music fans are some of the most prolific music thieves of all, bless their little hearts.
hokahey wrote:
jasper wrote:So, I agree with you. Fuck capitalist fat cats. Let's steal. Everything. Then, when they're all bled dry, we can actually live in a sustainable world.
:crazy:
This was a joke, but I actually think that it's less insane than what the Atlas Shrugged brain trust would like, but that is something that we will never, ever agree on, so let's not waste time doing this --> :blah: just because we have vastly different interests and life experiences.

CaseyContrarian
Posts: 1006
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:48 pm
Contact:

Re: JA's current Capitol deal (and promotion)

#33 Post by CaseyContrarian » Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:09 pm

As much as I'd love to relitigate the failed promise of the digital revolution and the paucity of vision of the major copyright aggregators, I gave at the office. Let's talk about Dave's tattoos or Perry's cape! :yeay:

Post Reply