Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
My only real issue with the band these days is that Perry just doesn't sound good. It's not nitpicking to want the lead singer to sing the actual melody of the song he's performing. I like some stuff on Strays and a lot of TGEA. Perry's just not trying and the backing tracks are lame.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Spot on.ant wrote:My only real issue with the band these days is that Perry just doesn't sound good. It's not nitpicking to want the lead singer to sing the actual melody of the song he's performing. I like some stuff on Strays and a lot of TGEA. Perry's just not trying and the backing tracks are lame.
We're apparently assholes though because we comment on the fact that he's half-assing it.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
okay that's the funniest thing i've read here, ever, in response to the time tested, set your watch by it, beginning of the tour comment from a lurker who resents that ja's biggest fans are also their biggest critics. the evidence suggests that, for good, bad or indifferent, 'we grew beyond them' does not accurately describe the regulars here.Larry B. wrote:Current Jane's Addiction fans don't eat here. They can eat at ja.com or ja.org. This is where the JA community eats. Our liking of the band is hard to explain because it's closely related to a wide range of time-space conditions. You have to experience it to understand it. We came together because of them, and we grew from there.[blink]We grew beyond them.[/blink]So fuck you.janesbiggestfan wrote: You can try reducing it to absurd, but it's really fucked up that on a JA board, a good 1/3 of the people are hateful, resentful bitches that shit on the band no matter what they do. Don't get me wrong. Hate all you want. But why come here? Why ruin what is still precious to us, who love the band still? Dont shit where we still eat assholes!
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Agreed. The correct comment would be "We expect more from them"
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
I meant "this website doesn't depend on them"
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
For some people it's extremely painful finding out there's no such thing as Santa Clause and they lash out at the people who suggest it.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Precisely.hokahey wrote:For some people it's extremely painful finding out there's no such thing as Santa Clause and they lash out at the people who suggest it.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
clearly they were talking about the Tim Allen movie.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
I love how you chose to make that just your 9th post. Clearly you save your comments for really important shit.tvrec wrote:or Claus.
-
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Jesus. All I was doing was speculating about Casey's emotional response to two songs that very much are about/for her being added to the set list after, I dunno, FOREVER. People have fucking emotions. It was fucking speculation. I'd have asked her myself on FB, but I don't like hassling people about shit that has meaning to them in a private way. And she apparently answered anyway, so all is fine.
To that person calling us out for being haters, I simply say that the Jane's I lived was incredibly meaningful in ways you might not get. I hope Muse does it for you. And if you like 2012 JA, have at: there's gonna be three legs to this tour!!!!!!
To that person calling us out for being haters, I simply say that the Jane's I lived was incredibly meaningful in ways you might not get. I hope Muse does it for you. And if you like 2012 JA, have at: there's gonna be three legs to this tour!!!!!!
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Yep. And it's good to know you can read my post count. It matters.hokahey wrote:I love how you chose to make that just your 9th post. Clearly you save your comments for really important shit.tvrec wrote:or Claus.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
No problem. I eagerly await post # 12 correcting my spelling of Ester Bunny.tvrec wrote:Yep. And it's good to know you can read my post count. It matters.hokahey wrote:I love how you chose to make that just your 9th post. Clearly you save your comments for really important shit.tvrec wrote:or Claus.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
or Esther Bunny.
A misguided Jewish stripper in Vaudeville.
A misguided Jewish stripper in Vaudeville.
Last edited by Romeo on Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
i was just about to go there, but i post too much.Romeo wrote:or Esther Bunny.
A misguided Jewish stripper in Vaudeville.