NCAAF

off-topic conversation unrelated to Jane's Addiction
Message
Author
User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#26 Post by Juana » Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:53 pm

Well if he goes pro then we're going to suck next year. Plain and simple. No Barkley = No chance at the Pac12...

Barkley also isn't even regarded as a top 3 QB in this draft. They have Luck, Moore, Jones all a head of him and he has no bowl game this year and can't go to the senior bowl. He stays he has a chance to be a top 5 pick but he leaves then he will probably be a second round pick depending on who needs QBs.

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#27 Post by kv » Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:54 pm

i don't agree, i don't think he will be a top 5 pick...but never know...who may be willing to move up for him...he is 6-2 and i think that drops him he had made it sound like he would stay but last few week have been we'll see how the season goes...which means he wants to go if everything this year goes great...even if it doesn't in the back of his head he wants to go....i really hope he stays..usc is gonna lose alot to the prs next year...sucks but with ncaa bans i don't blame them why stay when you are handcuffed

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#28 Post by Juana » Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:06 pm

Well next season they have a shot at a bowl and can compete to win the Pac 12 and go to the Rose Bowl. The biggest issue was Pete letting Nick Holt go with Sark up to Washington. He was an awesome recruiter and got people to stay. Rivers, Rey, Mays, Carson he got all of them to stay for their senior seasons.

Oh well as long as they beat fUCLA it will be okay.

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#29 Post by kv » Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:45 pm

Juana wrote:Well next season they have a shot at a bowl and can compete to win the Pac 12 and go to the Rose Bowl. The biggest issue was Pete letting Nick Holt go with Sark up to Washington. He was an awesome recruiter and got people to stay. Rivers, Rey, Mays, Carson he got all of them to stay for their senior seasons.

Oh well as long as they beat fUCLA it will be okay.
at this point ya win the pac games and smoke ucla...2012 is gonna suck we can only bring in 6 scholarships for 2012 will lose more players then that...which is why i can see barkley moving on ya we can go to a bowl game but odds are it won't be a good one

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#30 Post by Juana » Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:06 pm

Yeah but Kiffin stacked up on this recruiting class which there was no limit on so those players are playing this year and should be better next year. But if he's not coming back they need to put one of these Freshmen QBs in there sometimes to help get some reps in there so we're prepared and its not like when Sanchez left and left us completely fucked.

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#31 Post by kv » Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:22 pm

we are fucked anyway for a few more years...will take 5 more years to have a full senior class again...and thats with people not wanting to come here because we are years behind...prob take us close to 2020 to be 100% back

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#32 Post by Juana » Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:40 pm

Yeah but oh well had a good 8 year run. 6 Rose Bowls and 2 National Titles and the first time we were good since like 78 before Pete came so it is what it is. There will always be ups and downs . Just sucks that the NCAA leveled the program while still hasn't started with Miami and still really did nothing to Ohio State either even though the coach was ignoring things to keep his team up there...

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#33 Post by Juana » Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:01 am

FUCK AND YES!!! :lol: :lolol:

Man they're going to be good next year. Back into the BCS picture looking at all this talent that Kiffin has brought in.

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#34 Post by Juana » Sat Nov 26, 2011 9:39 pm

Fuck and YEAH about to get W # 10, 10-2 on the worst sanctions since the SMU death penalty.... going to finish in the top 8 heading into next year. Going to win a Nat title 3 years from now... book it.

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#35 Post by kv » Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:47 pm

well done lane drop that 50 burger on ucla and didn't let up till he hit 50..bravo on the last 2 years lane and co bravo

maaaannnn do i hope the kid comes back oh please oh please oh please

pac 12 south champs :rockon: fuck the rest of the world

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#36 Post by Juana » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:25 pm

Man they look good even with the sanctions they're building it back up down there. This was a special team and if Kahlil and Barkley come back as well as TJ next year will be a Rose Bowl team at least and honestly its been weird not playing in BCS bowls after the 8 years of Pete's era but it looks like Kiffin is actually learning how to coach.

creep
Site Admin
Posts: 10348
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:51 am

Re: NCAAF

#37 Post by creep » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:43 pm

i don't follow college football so someone tell me why ucla is playing in the conference championship game.

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#38 Post by Juana » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:53 pm

Because Larry Scott considers the conference championship game part of the "post season" when it clearly isn't and is trying to make sure the Pac 12 gets two teams into the BCS when Oregon beats fUCLA. Because if USC were to win that game they wouldn't be allowed to play in the Rose Bowl because of the bowl ban this season.

But hey fucked Oregon out of a national title shot, was an OT away from fucking Stanford, curb stomped fUCLA and trounced ND in their house. It was a good season BCS bowl or not.

creep
Site Admin
Posts: 10348
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:51 am

Re: NCAAF

#39 Post by creep » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:55 pm

i get usc not playing but why isn't stanford playing oregon?

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#40 Post by Juana » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:07 pm

Oregon beat Standford and won the North division and USC won the south division so 2nd place in the South gets to go.

creep
Site Admin
Posts: 10348
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:51 am

Re: NCAAF

#41 Post by creep » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:08 pm

Juana wrote:Oregon beat Standford and won the North division and USC won the south division so 2nd place in the South gets to go.
oh i didn't know there were separate divisions. lame

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#42 Post by Juana » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:27 pm

Yeah UCLA has no business being in that game but part of me hopes they can pull out the upset some how some way, it will not happen but it would be funny.

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#43 Post by kv » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:50 am

oh so now you route for ucla huh?

shame


ya the pack 12 is split in to 2 6 team sections which now allows for a championship game instead of old pac ten getting leapfroged by teams in the bcs in the final week who had their own conference championship games

so it's a good good thing except i think they split it up shitty..usc should win it every year for the rest of my life

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#44 Post by Juana » Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:09 am

kv wrote:oh so now you route for ucla huh?

shame


ya the pack 12 is split in to 2 6 team sections which now allows for a championship game instead of old pac ten getting leapfroged by teams in the bcs in the final week who had their own conference championship games

so it's a good good thing except i think they split it up shitty..usc should win it every year for the rest of my life
I'm not rooting for anyone, USC has won the Pac 12 as far as I'm concerned. But I would much rather see more Rick.. he gets to the Rose Bowl that buys him 3-4 more years and that is 3-4 more wins over fUCLA. I just said it would be funny. The real reason Larry Scott said USC can not be in the initial Pac 12 championship game is because he is afraid they would win so then he made it to where a cup cake gets set up for Oregon. Nothing aside from promising a great conference and coming back with Utah and Colorado would have been worse for Larry Scott than letting them play in the game and then the winner of the conference not eligible to play in the bowl.

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#45 Post by kv » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:23 pm

ricky is canned

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#46 Post by Juana » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:54 pm

yeah I saw that just now. I mean I'm happy his smug ass got fired but then again they might actually accidently get someone that can coach and they might win one once every say 13 years.

Either way I think another thing will be funny

Bama/LSU rematch and Bama wins and then LSU is AP champ and Bama is BCS champ and then the BCS explodes in a firey ball of death and we have our 12 team playoff.

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#47 Post by kv » Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:11 pm

BARKLEY STAYS!!!

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#48 Post by Juana » Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:24 pm

kv wrote:BARKLEY STAYS!!!
I had a feeling he would his dream was always to QB at USC and now he has a shot at a BCS bowl or maybe more. He stuck with us thru the sanctions and I knew when I saw the set up behind him on the USC website before the presser that he would be coming back. No way you line up all the Heismans and then say you're going to go pro.

That being said I look forward to the Oregon / USC Pac 12 title game next season because well there is no one rough on the schedule until that game next year!! Also Robert Woods had ankle surgery he played half the season on a bum ankle and still won the Belitnikoff or whatever. So stoked!!

But it makes sense when USC is good then the Lakers do not win titles lol

User avatar
kv
Posts: 8770
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: South Bay, SoCal

Re: NCAAF

#49 Post by kv » Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:27 pm

EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT CHARGERS AND LAKERS ARE LOOKING MEH...GOGO USC

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: NCAAF

#50 Post by Juana » Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:38 pm

kv wrote:EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT CHARGERS AND LAKERS ARE LOOKING MEH...GOGO USC
Hell yeah this is going to make everything work out, hell if the Dodgers get a new owner and get that sorted could have two MLB teams in the playoffs, both Lakers and Clips in the playoffs, Kings and Ducks in the playoffs... lol :aoa:

But right now I have a Rose Bowl in mind for USC.

Post Reply