crater wrote:kv wrote:on tv they mentioned the gb guy held it to his chest...how?
|
|
|
|
V
kv wrote:the hawks guy had his hand between the ball and his chest...
creep wrote:how do you miss the shove in the back?
Totally. But like Steve Young said, calls will get missed in a big play like that, as the refs were looking to see if a ball gets caught or not, and not so much if people are playing fair. But man o man there were TONS of bad calls this game, for both teams.
I'm a Hawks fan. GB got robbed tonight.
- Both players have the ball in mid air
- Seattle takes one hand off ball
- Seattle puts both hands back on ball before Packer lands with two feet
- Both players have both hands on the ball once they are both on the ground, but Packer has ball close to his chest (one of Seattle's hand is between ball and chest, there are 4 hands on the ball)
Close call, for sure...but overall yes I'd say interception, even though tie usually goes to the offense.
BUT...why the fuck are people so upset about this regular season BS call when the Hawks got multiple terrible calls against them in SUPER BOWL XL which completely altered the game and arguably cost Seattle the championship?? And that game featured the
normal refs...and that one ref even came out years later and admitted the calls were WRONG. That's way more messed up.
I agree the call was fucked up tonight, but I'll take it. I'll take it as a makeup call for the bullshit Seattle went through in Super Bowl XL...and trust me, I would rather have had us win
that game instead of tonight's.
BTW if this was reversed and it was Seattle making a game-winning interception that got called wrong and GB got the win/catch, this thing wouldn't be as blown up as it is.
The national media never gives the Hawks any credit, and love teams like Green Bay. Nobody will remember the fact that Seattle sacked Aaron Rogers EIGHT TIMES in the first half, that's for sure.
)
Watching football is not very healthy for you.
@ Stafford getting hurt again. Mr Glass is back again!
