that's what i thought. send that shit back larrykv wrote:not that i care in the slightest but if you already had a number in your head it wasn't a fair contest where everyone had an equal shot at a random drawn number
june 2 san francisco
Re: june 2 san francisco
Re: june 2 san francisco
no no no I knew this was coming! hahacreep wrote:that's what i thought. send that shit back larrykv wrote:not that i care in the slightest but if you already had a number in your head it wasn't a fair contest where everyone had an equal shot at a random drawn number
Mike called me out of the blue and said pick a number for the contest. I had NO idea how he was doing it. I was new to the message boards for one and knew nothing about the site keeping track of your sign up number. So I picked 69(I have it tattooed on me). Larry was the 69th person to registrar at pf.net. But I did not know that
I know you are just fucking with me but I wanted to try and explain lol and it seems confusing but it was an honest contest how ever it went down haha!
Re: june 2 san francisco
sure it was......would you like to swim with mermaids? they love jane's addiction...
Re: june 2 san francisco
well if it was fixed i'm 100% sure larry would not be your first pick.ragdoll wrote:no no no I knew this was coming! hahacreep wrote:that's what i thought. send that shit back larrykv wrote:not that i care in the slightest but if you already had a number in your head it wasn't a fair contest where everyone had an equal shot at a random drawn number
Mike called me out of the blue and said pick a number for the contest. I had NO idea how he was doing it. I was new to the message boards for one and knew nothing about the site keeping track of your sign up number. So I picked 69(I have it tattooed on me). Larry was the 69th person to registrar at pf.net. But I did not know that
I know you are just fucking with me but I wanted to try and explain lol and it seems confusing but it was an honest contest how ever it went down haha!
Re: june 2 san francisco
exactly!creep wrote:well if it was fixed i'm 100% sure larry would not be your first pick.ragdoll wrote:no no no I knew this was coming! hahacreep wrote:that's what i thought. send that shit back larrykv wrote:not that i care in the slightest but if you already had a number in your head it wasn't a fair contest where everyone had an equal shot at a random drawn number
Mike called me out of the blue and said pick a number for the contest. I had NO idea how he was doing it. I was new to the message boards for one and knew nothing about the site keeping track of your sign up number. So I picked 69(I have it tattooed on me). Larry was the 69th person to registrar at pf.net. But I did not know that
I know you are just fucking with me but I wanted to try and explain lol and it seems confusing but it was an honest contest how ever it went down haha!
Re: june 2 san francisco
Larry B. wrote:
Re: june 2 san francisco
Larry B. wrote:Larry B. wrote:
Re: june 2 san francisco
see now it COULD of went like this:
Mike: pick a number
Ragdoll: 12
(Mike saw that was Six7Six7)
Mike: nah, pick another number
Ragdoll: 58
(Mike saw it was creep)
Mike: nope....try again
Ragdoll: 42
(Mike saw it was kv)
Mike: sigh.....
J/K
Mike: pick a number
Ragdoll: 12
(Mike saw that was Six7Six7)
Mike: nah, pick another number
Ragdoll: 58
(Mike saw it was creep)
Mike: nope....try again
Ragdoll: 42
(Mike saw it was kv)
Mike: sigh.....
J/K
Re: june 2 san francisco
Well put. Exactly how I felt......they're just pros now, no art.phenobarb_bambalam wrote:Should anyone care:
They dropped "Three Days".
It's hard to fathom how unmoved I was throughout the show.
- Pandemonium
- Posts: 5720
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: june 2 san francisco
Wow, that's probably the lamest Janes setlist I've ever seen.
Re: june 2 san francisco
UTB should always be an opener, in to Whores, then unpredictable.
Re: june 2 san francisco
i hate you so much.Larry B. wrote:Larry B. wrote: